Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Book hidden face of credit

this article was written in an neutral and informative way, some one else can make corrections or additions since that is my understanding of the process. It it not discussing if the book is excellent but rather narrating its content the same layout approach I found in other articles about books.

Can someone make appropriate corrections and additions? Someone impartial which has wikipeadia extensive experience (I am new at this.... and the experience has been frustating at best...

As per the comments on notability? Do the people who made the comments speak french? Did they spent 5 years studying credit and consumer credit? If yes then their comments are valid otherwise their merely express their personal opinion and are not based on fact....

This book was accepted by Quebecor leading published in French Canada. They received over 2000 manuscripts out of which they publish 20 that is about 1% success rate. They only publish if the authors have the credential and the reputation on the topic matter.

I have been asking for help from someone experienced to re-write this article the correct way to be acceptable (since there seems so remarks on the contents).

The book is not for sale so the object is publication of free knowledge on an important topic not commercial one.

There seems to be lots of note on the world notable. Please list me practical books on consumer credit (not that many). However books on hacking and programming enough to drawn on.

I read the tag "Free Encyclopedia" -- I am getting the message NOTABLE, CLOSED and FOR ELITE writers only encyclopedia. Contributions not welcome. For help just read the instructions and links provided, if we don't understand them, we must therefore not be qualified to contribute. If this is the reaction someone with good intentions to share knowledge gets I wonder what is the response to the less computer knowledgeable person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JorgeS (talk • contribs) 13:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Ladies and Gentlemen Please Delete article
Sorry for wasting everyones time and effort. Please delete the article. I have reached the following conclusions: - the tag line "the free encyclopedia" is misleading - it is not worth the discussion or the time already spent - it is academic - it is only for NOTABLE wikipedian elite, should consider new name Notable-pedia - it is part of web 1.0 - if found KNOL web 2.0 - the free web will always moves faster and the elite can not stop free knowledge distribution - good luck for wikipedia all the best - all the best - please also delete my ID as I will not be back Regards JorgeS (talk) 22:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)jorges