Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Bosnian Mujahideen

I guess I already proved "Bosnian Mujahideen" or "Bosnian mujahideen" is a neologism? So, what is still debated? --HanzoHattori (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Listen up. ALL OF THIS was taken there from the project page to remove my arguments and discussion on them (it was done ONLY with what I wrote, and what others wrote about this). I think it was a form of censorship. I don't remove them from here, I take it back where it belong (to "discussion"). So, stop this already. --HanzoHattori (talk) 10:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

SO, what is still debated? Is it "it's not neologism because wikipedia editors think it is not, who cares about if it's used outside of wikipedia" or something? --HanzoHattori (talk) 10:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments posted at the top, out of order

 * It seems that certain interested parties in the Bosnian conflict are lobbying for deletion. To avoid a skewed result, their input should carry little weight here IMO. --Hereward77 (talk) 17:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Live Forever
...voted to delete this but keep the Serb Propaganda in the Yugoslav Wars in the 1990s article. :))) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 19:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)