Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Brian Boxer Wachler (2nd nomination)

Strong Keep I believe that edits to the page on August 31 were akin to vandalism BECAUSE the objection raised was over self citing and the edits gutted the page entirely. I think the page should be kept and the edits suggested by one of the other users should be made and a discussion then had with the relevant mods on other revisions. My research indicates the doctor is noteworthy (a simple google news search combined with a google scholar search reveals that, and the page serves an important purpose. I'd be happy to help suggest edits to the mods. There is a very real interest in this doctor's work because it is unique and therefore noteworthy. If only 10 sources were poorly cited, to gut an entire page seems inappropriate.  Aren't we supposed to be focused on working together to get pages right? The solution isn't deletion, it's editing. Jf3300 (talk) 05:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: Post your comment Articles for deletion/Brian Boxer Wachler (2nd nomination) here Cannolis (talk) 06:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)