Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Candy Maaka

All users who voted delete, did not judge the article nor the subject correctly. Premature and incorrect assumptions (eg, only local sources (incorrect); Award win was not notable (incorrect) etc) and I responded to these assumptions with facts. What was the reason behind the decision to delete, as I saw no 'delete votes' with any solid case to delete. All 'delete voters' assumed that the article was COI/vanity/self promotion - which were all false. So why were the 'delete votes' listened to, over valid reason? Subject did not know about this article and now you want to keep it on file as a 'delete page?' No wonder people say contributing to Wiki is like joining a frat. JF1982 (talk) 07:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)