Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Cannabis in Vatican City

Discussion

 * , this XFD *AfD has been a sitting duck for a while now. Do you have any updates or anything to add, or are you going to drop it, or did you forget or something else?-- ~Sıgehelmus♗(Tøk) 19:08, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * That's not how AfDs work. A nominator proposes an argument for deletion, other users contribute rationales for their preferred course of action and after a week, an administrator will either close the discussion (if there is a consensus) or relist it for another week. I have explained in a lot of detail why I think the article should be deleted, after useful content is moved to Cannabis and religion. It's now up to other users to state their opinions here so we can gather consensus. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 19:51, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I know, and if no one comes?-- ~Sıgehelmus♗(Tøk) 19:53, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I've moved this discussion to the talk page as it's rather meta—I hope you don't mind. If there is not consensus, the discussion will be relisted. If it is relisted several times and there is still no consensus, it will be closed "no consensus". It is not the nominator's job to get people to comment at an AfD. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 20:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)