Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Carlos Lamela

Carlos Lamela is the only owner of Estudio Lamela and the one who sign their projects so i think he deserves his own article. As Richard Rogers and Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners (Partners of Carlos Lamela at Barajas Airport ), or Norman Foster and Foster&Partners (even if it's clear Carlos isn't as good architect as them, Estudio Lamela is one of the main architecture firms in Spain). Thething73 (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * , thanks for backing my argument that Carlos Lamela has no notability beyond his involvement with Estudio Lamela. Cabayi (talk) 10:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)


 * , thanks for your fine irony, but returning to facts I think that to be the owner and main architect of a firm for the last 20 years is way more than involvement.

Thething73 (talk) 14:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)


 * , The irony (which you seem to be missing) is that, the more often you claim Carlos Lamela is notable for being owner of, involved with, associated with Estudio Lamela the more you make it clear that his ONLY claim to notability is his ownership of, involvement with, association with Estudio Lamela which already has an article. He doesn't WP:INHERIT notability from the business. Cabayi (talk) 15:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Dear : maybe I'm not explaining myself, but Estudio Lamela is a Professional Limited Society. This, in Spain, means that all the work of Estudio Lamela is the whole responsability of the owner, who needs to be an architect. So all work done in the firm is his work. If you think that to be the architect of one of the biggest architecture firms in Spain has no notability, well it's ok then.

Greetings Thething73 (talk) 15:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)


 * No,, you continue to make it clear that his only claim to notability is through Estudio Lamela. I have no problem understanding that. Cabayi (talk) 16:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)