Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Cassie Jaye

Closing rationale
User:PeterTheFourth asked me to provide a more detailed rationale for closing this AfD as keep. Starting from a pure nosecount, there are twice as many editors arguing to keep than to delete, with additional editors who argued to redirect the article (which is not a deletion argument in itself). So at a first pass, there is no visible consensus to delete.

Unpacking the arguments, it's clear that a majority of the users participating in the discussion agreed with Agricola44's position that the article's sources indicated a WP:GNG pass, which is a sensible, policy-based argument. I disregarded the keep argument from the low-edit-count IP user (as is common practice for AfD closing) but even without that contribution there's an evident consensus not to delete the article.

There's a significant minority viewpoint that the article should be redirected, but AfD is not the appropriate venue for that discussion, which can continue on the article's talk page.  A  Train talk 08:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! PeterTheFourth (talk) 09:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC)