Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Charlene McMann (3rd nomination)

You sure there wasn't a consensus? --Rentier (talk) 00:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

- I'd like to see the reasoning behind this decision as well if you don't mind. You have gotten yourself in trouble performing non-admin closures in the past. I would suggest you read this. Regards,   Aloha27   talk  02:00, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * No, there is no consensus in this discussion. Both sides have made valid policy-based arguments, which cannot be discounted. SST flyer 05:27, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * No offence SSTflyer, but I believe we'd better get an admin to make the call here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charlene_McMann_%283rd_nomination%29 else we get to go through the whole process again. We must get it right. A fourth nomination would be a waste of time for all concerned. As I understand it, this is not a suitable instance for a non-admin closure. Regards,   Aloha27   talk  06:13, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello, the template intended for admin help is . However, this should be taken over to deletion review forum. Regards— UY Scuti Talk  08:10, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ Thank You,   Aloha27   talk  12:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC)