Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Chris Garrett

Rescue

 * Moved from AFD. لenna  vecia  04:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * That template should be deleted... any AFD should automatically be assumed to be up for rescue if there is a way to rescue it. A huge box on the page larger than the deletion vote box is completely pointless. DreamGuy (talk) 19:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Let me know if I can help/if you propose deletion of that template. I think I'm an inaugural member of the "rescue hall of fame" so perhaps my !vote will carry some extra weight due to that ;) -Pete (talk) 19:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * However, I wonder whether maybe the AFD box should be modified to include the concept of "rescue." This sentence: Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. Could be rewritten, maybe as follows:
 * Feel free to improve the article during the discussion; this is often the most effective way to prevent deletion. The article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed.
 * -Pete (talk) 19:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I would support that rewording of the AFD template. All AFDs should be seen as an opportunity for improvement, and if it's not clear to people it should be made more clear. We should probably take this to the talk page of the templates in question, though. DreamGuy (talk) 19:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. -Pete (talk)