Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Chris Musni

= Closing administrators comments = Please do not inturrupt my comments here, please add any comments below the "other comments" header, in the section below.

Raw count analysis
AfD is not a vote, but evaluating consensus does start with a quick tally count, discounting SPA's and finding duplicate entries by the same editor.

Delete

 * 1) Mr.Vernon
 * 2) Morbidthoughts (6 edits)
 * 3) Corvuscornix
 * 4) Icewedge (4 edits)
 * 5) HongQiGong

Keep

 * 1) Gchuva (22 edits) <3 edits as 116.48.49.113, 1 edit as 203.98.174.74>
 * 2) MikeCline (2 edits)
 * 3) Advocate 
 * 4) Demetri1968
 * Vivekmahbubani
 * Stilldating

Non-participatory

 * SineBot (2 edits)
 * Cirt
 * FalconKirtaran

Delete

 * Fails WP:BIO
 * most search hits come from show listings
 * No cult following
 * No significant press coverage
 * contest won was not notable contest
 * no significant coverage in reliable sources
 * no reliable sources
 * only trivial or unreliable sources
 * article lacks sources and verifiable content

Keep

 * Hong Kong Funniest Person Contest win is notable
 * significant roles in notable comedy performances
 * Has cult following
 * made unique contributions to the field of entertainment
 * might not fail wp:bio
 * article will improve when career improves
 * ilikeit
 * The Chinese government makes it hard to verify
 * passes wp:bio

Determination of consensus
This discussion certainly has managed to garner sufficient participation such as is required to determine that further discussion is unlikely to change the outcome. Note that the discussion was already relisted twice. The direction of the arguments did not make any change toward the end, so it is evident to me that it will not change if relisted again. With any nearly even split of !votes, it is important to determine if there is consensus to be found in the discussion. In this case, I find that the deletion arguments are objective, solidly grounded in policy, consistent with guidelines, and in alignment with community consensus. For the most part, the keep arguments are subjective, and lack reliable sources to verify their veracity. My decision is therefore delete.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 03:28, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

=Other comments=