Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Christine Dietrich

In your article about ME you'r quoting Swiss journalist Benjamin Rosch as you crown witness who deliberatly wanted to construct a non existent relation between myself an mass murderer Anders Breivik amongst other wrong information. Note, that journalist Benjamnin Rosch has been found gulty for defamtion by Swiss authorities for exactly the newspaper articels quoted in the Wikipedia article. If your goal is really information and not just the destruction of ME (and note, I'm still a humand being, even if you'd probably like to see me dead finally) this artcle must be removed- thank you. Christine Dietrich
 * Could you please provide any sources for the verdict. Because I didn't found anything.🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The verdict was not published in an newspaper because I didn't want to read further newspaper articles about me. I have the verdicts here. Issuer is the public persecutor of Basel Stadt, both Ritter an Rosch have been found guilty for defamation against me. The verdict numers are: VT.2020.19117 (Ritter) and VT.2019.24805(Rosch). Both verdicts have been accepted and are legally valid.(talk) 18:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC+1)
 * Do you mean the "Dietrich filed charges..." line? That isn't being presented as a "relationship between you and a mass murderer". It says that Markus Ritter said that about you, and that you filed charges - ie, that you not only disagree but think he's so completely wrong he's legally at fault for saying it. Those are both facts, right? And relevant to the article at hand. It would certainly be irresponsible to only mention the quote and omit that you'd filed a lawsuit over it, but that's not what's happening here. By the way, if you have any newspaper articles that are about you that aren't related to various Islamophobia/xenophobia controversies, you're welcome to share them here for editors to work through and see what can be included. For obvious reasons, it's hard for us to find those, but you might know of some...? -- asilvering (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * "By the way, if you have any newspaper articles that are about you that aren't related to various Islamophobia/xenophobia controversies, you're welcome to share them here for editors to work through and see what can be included. For obvious reasons, it's hard for us to find those, but you might know of some...?" Is this me, or is there a lot of pejudice and malice in this question? Of course it's me, isn't it. I've nothing to do with this PI-platform for more than 10 years now andy by the way there was no single text I wrote there that was in any ways against the law. I clearly distanced myself from this blog. But until now - over 10 years later! - I'm still burning on the same stakes, because people (like you?) keep the fire still burning, instead of finally leave me in peace. I accidentally found this Wikipedia article as I'm checking my name on Google search from time to time. I'm not used to write as an Wikipedia author, I'm not familiar with all this codes and as you might could know English is a foreign language for me. I'm just trying to defend myself as a human being. As for Rosch/Ritter you could mention there were verdicts of difamation. They tried to turn an old and cold story into a new and hot one - with nothing new at all in fact. A bit a diffenent view on what happened was published in the Weltwoche mentioned here: https://weltwoche.ch/story/hexenjagd-zu-basel/ I'd really appreciate if you could finally delete the unnessecary Wikipedia entry about me as it is manly based on false accusations. If you don't, you could at least mention my doctoral thesis about Asylum published in 2008 at Kohlhammer publishing in the Series about Old an New Testament studies. https://books.google.ch/books/about/Asyl.html?id=mBfceMy-jq8C&redir_esc=y. It's a compearing research about legal texts in the biblical writings compared with texts from ancient Greece ancieant Orient, Rome and Egypt as well as later reception in church asylum. Maybe surprising for you I'm mentioning the practice of asylum in a positive way.(talk) 19:56, 5 February 2022 (UTC+1)