Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Clipbucket

I think the description is too short, that's why it's marked for deletion. Adding 2 or 3 lines would help. It shouldn't be deleted anyway.

I agree, it certainly is a mistake.

Btw those guys talking about it being not notable and providing some links:

One is limiting the search to only include a very little spectrum of google's database. He should not count. I didn't notice, i would've voted to keep, resulting in it being kept right? I was ill for some time and couldn't participate.

Another is talking about a passing mention, which is ok, but shouldn't be a minus. Does anyone know cirtex hosting?! HostV?! If not, i give up.. They're notable, and they think clipbucket is too.

Long article about clipbucket ONLY: http://www.w3reports.com/index.php?itemid=1974

and here: http://www.hostreview.com/news/080826PressAdvance1.html

and here: http://www.thehostingnews.com/news-cirtexhosting-and-hostv-web-hosting-companies-donate-to-cancer-research-5703.html (yes, clipbucket is there too)

Does that work?

TheoUTSKIRTs (talk) 15:40, 24 April 2010 (UTC)