Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Colis P. Huntington High School


 * Wow, now we have two cabals. The old "keep all schools not matter what" one... and now the new "delete all schools no matter what" one. *shakes head*. Is anyone voting on this bothering to look at this particular article?Gateman1997 23:54, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Bad form. Please see WP:CIV and WP:FAITH. -  brenneman (t) (c)  00:00, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I consider not reading articles before voting on them to be worse form, but I do apologize if you considered my comment to be uncivil. And I don't subscribe to WP:FAITH with regard to schools anymore. Gateman1997 00:07, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * What magic is this that allows you to detect if someone hasn't examine the article? - brenneman (t) (c)  00:22, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * People's own comments give away their knowledge of the article. I won't point out any particular votes but they stand out glaringly. (and no they aren't just delete votes)Gateman1997 00:24, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I expect he's using the kind of voodoo that you yourself have made into a specialty, Aaron. --Tony Sidaway Talk 01:34, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Just because you either don't understand it or don't like the results doesn't mean it's wrong. And religious disparagement has no place here. -  brenneman (t) (c)  01:53, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * You're religious? I'm not.  Voodoo, transsubstantiation, transmigration, it's all just nonsense to me. --Tony Sidaway Talk  02:10, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Apparently mathematics, statistics, and predictive modelling as well. brenneman (t) (c)  02:19, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I was a math major, don't try to bullshit me. --Tony Sidaway Talk 02:21, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Then your opacity is deliberate. - brenneman (t) (c)  02:25, 2 September 2005 (UTC)