Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Concerns for an early Mars sample return

Deleted Post
Here is the comment by Robert I deleted:


 * Also want to point out to anyone else reading this that Warren as predicted reverted my attempted reversion. And I am sure if I did edit it to add extra sections on the material I consider to be the main body of the article he would immediately delete them, and if I attempted to delete his unsourced editorial synthesis in the current article he would revert it to restore his content. It is obvious from the things he said the discussion on the talk page that this would happen, so there is no point in attempting it. Robert Walker (talk) 11:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

I did not revert the reversion. As Robert finally acknowledges. Nor do I appreciate the gratuitous characterization of my editing as "unsourced editorial synthesis" nor is attempts at reading my mind and predicting my behavior. Warren Platts (talk) 13:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)