Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Confusion Bowl

I think this article is very helpful, and that it should NOT be deleted 2600:100B:A004:5E17:2D27:206A:A604:F7AB (talk) 21:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

I don’t understand why it would be considered for deletion in the first place. Somebody hates football? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1016:b101:52e1:a488:4084:d1ce:804e (talk • contribs) 13:59, August 31, 2023 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia has inclusion criteria which in this case is the general notability guideline. In short, i states that for an article such as this to be kept it has to have received multiple sources of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject over a sufficiently significant period of time, something that I and others believe is the case. Please not that statements such as "Somebody hates football?" have not even once helped preventing an article from being deleted on Wikipedia. Alvaldi (talk) 19:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC)


 * What does it mean, quantitatively, to "have received multiple sources of significant coverage in reliable sources" (which BTW, is a fairly invalid stipulation based solely on the repetitive use of the word "sources") ??? 2603:6011:C102:7306:8873:81DD:A24E:BD01 (talk) 13:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

This is gold for Wikipedia:unusual articles. Please keep this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1004:B210:CFF0:6814:486E:B548:FF51 (talk) 22:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Save Confusion
Save the Confusion Bowl!!! #allaboutheu #305 #booredhawks #gocanes Saveconfusion2023 (talk) 16:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)