Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Corporate Insight

Hi everyone/DGG

If I did this wrong I apologize. I see these guys quoted alot so I made them an article. Rather than deleting this can I try again with a different approach?

So two questions:

First, what would you have me do to make it less promotional? Basically, what strikes you as bias. Would adding a criticism section (if I could find that material) be helpful?

Second, what would make for better sources? I figured being frequently quoted would count as notable so that's why I used that for most of the sources. What kind of sources are you looking for?

Please advise. And sorry I'm new!

Thanks!

Ps - If this isn't the proper way to respond to your comment I also apologize for that