Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Covenant Eyes

I was a 5 year user of the C.E. software and travel in a lot of circles where it is widely used both by individuals and organizations, primarily churches. As such, I feel confident with my familiarity with the function of the software, but am also not particularly biased about it's usage, focus, etc. I read the initial article and found it not only to be rather incompletely/uninformative, but also respect the concerns of bias. I'm fairly new (ie a total beginner) at wiki editing, but I did begin an informal rewrite of the content today to the best of my ability. I'll try to look into the expectations for citation, and not sure how my useage history helps qualify me as a source. In general I know there are quite a few companies written up on wikipedia and can't see a reason why C.E. should not, however, I think a more balanced explanation is certainly in order. More later! Motomike777 (talk) 02:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Moto

Pretty weak comment results to justify deletion. Sad. JayHubie (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2013 (UTC)