Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Cures Can Be Found Act of 2007

I've removed the sentences inserted from this deleted article into Stem_cell_controversy since there was no consensus for a small merge, but also to avoid GFDL problems as otherwise we would need to keep the attributions. As editor I'd suggest to restrict that section of an artcile on a global ethical debate to actual US congressional responses, but whoever is interested in mentioning Paul can raise the issue there.--Tikiwont (talk) 11:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I reinserted my three sentences. They were not a "small merge", but a recasting of my own source research into the format of that article, where it was appropriate. There is no GFDL problem, as this was not a cut-and-paste of other editors' work (for which attribution might be lost), but a one-shot recast of the most relevant info on this Act for that article. And a Congressional bill with 11 sponsors which represents an important POV (the libertarian and Constitutional view that the feds should neither ban nor subsidize) is an actual Congressional response, though of course not a response that rises to the level of new law. Please do not overzealously delete sourced, relevant content because of a presumed GFDL problem and a personal suggestion. Thanks. John J. Bulten (talk) 03:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * John, this is undue emphasis at its silliest. It's never gonna get anywhere, it's gonna die in committee the same way this bill always does. The only reason anybody wants it in Wikipedia is so that they can point it out as something Ron Paul has "accomplished"! I'm gonna be so glad when he finally drops out and the pressure diminishes (slightly) on all these articles. -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  04:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Mike, my declining to address your response in detail should not be taken as indicating that I would respond that way to your usual reasonable posts. Suffice to say that I was thankful for the opportunity you provided for me to learn how to fix broken anchors quietly. John J. Bulten (talk) 14:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)