Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Daniel Chilson

This article should not be deleted because the reasons for its deletion are for the subjective whims of deletionists in Wikipedia to manage knowledge under the umbrella of "Notability." If the material in this article can be verified in accordance with verifiability, then it should be retained in the interest of exhaustiveness of encyclopedic material. I urge that it be removed from this arbitrary list of "Articles for Deletion."--Drboisclair (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Despite the views of inclusionists, Wikipedia is not a junkyard. GregJackP (talk) 14:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)