Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/David Casavis

As a source of news and information, Wikipedia should provide as much relevant background as possible on both sides of controversies. In this case, the contest between David Casavis and his opponent, Scott Stringer, should feature at least an entry on each of these candidates. So long as Wikipedia discusses Stringer, at great length, there also should be a page about Casavis, so people can learn about David Casavis and add to said page whatever pertinent, new information may arise. Murdock2000 (talk) 09:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I think you misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia. It is not a source of news about subjects.  Wikipedia covers notable subjects and the way we determine if a subject is notable is to look for significant coverage in reliable sources.  Being a candidate for a political office does not make someone notable.  An article about the candidates opponent does not make them notable either.  As has been stated earlier, if any significant coverage in reliable sources is found let us know so we can re-evaluate our position.   GB fan  talk 13:19, 4 October 2009 (UTC)