Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Decred (3rd nomination)

There's a new Forbes article today so the comment by smalltalk is now outdated: https://www.forbes.com/sites/leslieankney/2019/01/11/who-should-hold-power-decred-governance-and-what-it-means-for-investors/

There have been a number of more high-profile articles about Decred recently since the launch of Politeia, an innovative voting system for governing the project's treasury. In a couple of years time, Politeia will likely have its own page.

Please don't delete this page, it had a good deal of neutral descriptive content about Decred before it was valdalized. There are several recent coindesk articles and this Forbes one which can be referenced now also.

As an aside: In my opinion the best sources for cryptocurrency pages are their own documentation, restricting articles to only using recognisable brand news media will limit how useful wikipedia's cryptocurrency pages can be.

Wikitheblockchain (talk) 02:12, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * That's NOT a reliable source, so makes no difference. --Calton | Talk 02:47, 12 January 2019 (UTC)