Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Democracy & Nature (4th nomination)

The AFD page is not a talk page. Can you all please keep your comments to a minimum in the AFD? If you want to discuss do it here. Cwobeel (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I still believe that there is too much back and forth in the AFD page. Nominator is coming close to being disruptive of the process Cwobeel (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Popups tells me that you've been here for two years and have over 4000 contributions. Nevertheless, you seem to be relatively new to AFD (I myself have participated in over 600 such debates). If you think I am being disruptive, I think you know where WP:ANI is. This is, I think, the first time I have seen an AFD talk page used because somebody thinks that discussion is not part of an AFD (or, worse, is "disruptive"). Please familiarize yourself with procedures before devising your own set of rules. --Randykitty (talk) 14:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I am not impressed by your editcountitis, I must say. And I still believe that your chit chat at the AFD is not conducive to find consensus, which is what this discussion is about. Cwobeel (talk) 14:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Dear Randykitty please avoid comparing your collections of stats with thοse of Cwobeel (...) the debate is not about the creator or any other editors of the article, nor is it about the AfD nominator or anyone who has commented on the AfD. See: WP:ADHOM. Nikosgreencookie (talk) 18:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)