Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Doc Halo

Do Not Delete I am the author of Doc Halo and I don't understand why it is being considered for deletion. I have provided several non-press release references and will be adding more now that the company is growing. I don't see why it matters if it is local coverage or not. Besides it is only a matter of time before bigger media outlets start talking about Doc Halo. Secure texting applications are becoming more popular every day and should be worth mentioning. For example, TigerText, which is similar to Doc Halo, has it's own Wikipedia page. I think you all are being a little harsh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 25.35 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 31 December 2013‎
 * You may wish to move this comment to the end of the discussion that is taking place on Articles for deletion/Doc Halo, so that others will see it and address the issues you are raising. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  01:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Nevermind, I see you have done so already.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  01:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)