Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Duke Greenhill

Notable, Verifiable and Neutral
I disagree with the deletion of this article. From the previous discussion, it looks like the concern is that the article is promotional/spam. Edwardx sites some copy from the lede, which strikes me not as promotional, but simply true. Reviewing a number of the 32 cited sources, many of which are articles published in well-respected media by the subject, it seems to me that the sum of the sources indicates fact not promotion. In other words, if the subject is regularly published in media like FastCompany, quoted by international news outlets like The Telegraph, and a frequent speaker on the relevant subject matter at national conferences and seminars, do these taken together not indicate (indeed, prove) the subject is a “leader,” a “recognized expert,” and “published thought leader” on the relevant topics? I think it does. Perhaps (big perhaps), the article could revised slightly for a more objective tone, but I see nothing “wrong” with it. There seems to me to be, per Wikipedia guidelines, ample “coverage in reliable and independent sources” over a period of more than a decade; thus, the article’s subject qualifies, I think, as both “notable” and not temporarily so. I believe that article should be permitted to remain, again, perhaps with minor revisions for increased objectivity. Thanks. Iago1608 (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC)