Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Eanna Cullen


 * Delete I cant find any significant reviews for this authors apparently self published books. the article of course is transparently written by the agent, but thats not enough for deletion. COI alone just makes for a lousy article. if anyone can find some legitimate info, id surely reconsider, as i dont want to delete based on my inability to find a valid third party or secondary source. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Was this supposed to go on the AFD page? If so, you might want to move it. And FWIW, my reason for deletion wasn't because of COI; it was because it doesn't meet the notability guidelines. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 05:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * thanks, i did that. and i agree, coi is not grounds for deletion in this case, but notability. sad if hes a good writer.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)