Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Eight Pattern Wing Chun

Sorry to say so, but I can find no hint of any background about the topic Wing Chun neither at Noq nor at FisherQueen. Shouldn't you know something about a topic when proposing deletion? I may be wrong, but this still confuses me... Just to be clear: I am the same Matthias Gruber as the one who founded Eight Pattern Wing Chun (not sure if linking here is against any policy, starting to get paranoid...). But I believe to have written a quite neutral article and I provided a notable independent source, so I am wondering what else I should do? GruberMatthias (talk) 16:13, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

I am saddened to see that now other Wing Chun branch pages are being proposed for deletion due to my mentioning them in this discussion. Is this really the right direction to go? ALL of the Wing Chun branch pages in the Wing Chun section could be deleted by these standards, but shouldn't we rather aim to improve articles and delete only as a last measure? Storage capacity is surely not the problem in 2012, and the overall quality of Wikipedia is rather improved than worsened by having information about Wing Chun branches besides the very well known, super-commercial ones which can afford to advertise in large. Just saying... GruberMatthias (talk) 16:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)