Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Einstein's razor

The bias toward this article exists because the article mentions "intelligence" and "design". The article is marked for deletion because of politics. To confirm this opinion, see the article on "Intelligent Design" where bias trumps objectivity as a mission.
 * Not really. The issue is whether it says anything of any note not already covered in Occam's razor. At best it could be a section in that article. If the phrase really is in some way closely associated with the Intelligent Design movement that would make the article MORE notable. It also wouldn't matter as much that the concept doesn't seem much different. If you can demonstrate that this is a term widely used by ID proponents (with references to some publication of note) then the article might be worth saving.Nick Connolly (talk) 18:38, 17 March 2008 (UTC)