Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Weise

Off-topic Comment
It seems Mike has made it his mission as an editor to pursue my edits. When he is around, which is not very often, he is always involved in pages that I start or contribute to, no matter what the topic. The problem is that his contributions are limited to reverts and starting and/or participating in deletion discussions. I cannot remember one instance where he added any content to the multitude of pages that I have been involved in.

To see some examples of Mike's "contributions"
 * start here Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Pao_effect and follow the links.

He has also recently shown up in a discussion about AfD culture, a discussion I have put some effort into. Ottawahitech (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)please ping me

Misleading description of the Stanford Fellowship
The following wording which user:Voceditenore has complained  about at  Talk:Elizabeth_Weise  namely  had been  "lified" word-for word from John S. Knight Fellowships for Professional Journalists.

I am addressing the remark here because this page is unlikely to be deleted and I am not pinging user:Voceditenor because I have been requested not to. Ottawahitech (talk) 02:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Ottawahitech, can you please point to where I have requested you not to ping me? That is an absurd comment. Secondly and more importantly, the WP article John S. Knight Fellowships for Professional Journalists is equally misleading. Kindly read the fellowship's own criteria for selection rather than relying on Wikipedia which is not a reliable source for any purpose. Voceditenore (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pinging me. I thought you had asked me to stop pinging you when our relationship turned sour, but I honestly don't remember where and I am glad to hear that we are now on talking terms again(?). It would really help if you drop your condescending tone, though.
 * As far as John S. Knight Fellowships for Professional Journalists is concerned I just wonder why it has not been corrected? Ottawahitech (talk) 15:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * We did not have a "relationship" and it did not "turn sour". I criticised you last March for repeatedly casting aspersions on another editor, asked you to stop, and explained why. At no point did I ask you to stop pinging me. I suggest you re-read what I wrote on your talk page last March. What would "really help" in AfD discussions involving articles you have created is for you to refrain from implying, as you have both in this section and the one above, that editors who argue for deletion are doing so not for policy-based reasons but out of personal animosity to you. It is entirely inappropriate. On your suggestion I have corrected the Knight Fellowships article, removed the inaccurate fluff, expanded it, added references, and moved it to its correct title John S. Knight Journalism Fellowships at Stanford. Voceditenore (talk) 15:50, 27 November 2015 (UTC)