Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Eunice Penix

BLP1E
Can anyone explain why this article belongs in a discussion about the application of BLP1E? Niteshift36 (talk) 03:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Reverting of Village Pump Discussion
The comment about the Village Pump Discussion above has been reverted 3 times by the exact same user. I have started this section to discuss the relevance of this link and whether it should be kept in the AfD, or if it should be removed by an uninvolved administrator. I see no reason to remove it, as there is no flagrant policy violation in the statement itself, and the statement is not completely nor conclusively irrelevant. Thoughts?--Jax 0677 (talk) 03:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * This is where discussions like this go, not in the AfD. I'll go find you an admin sport. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Here is your other response: You've got no room to preach civility. Your passive aggressive silliness is most uncivil. And if you'd like, I'll wikilink it when I say you're being a dick. 3RR doesn't only count for a single item, it's any item in the article. I need not prove you're being a dick. It's clear you have sand in your bathing suit over this.Niteshift36 (talk) 04:26, 26 November 2012 (UTC)