Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Exopolitics (0th nomination)

KEEP - There is enough credible evidence pointing to the fact that we are not alone. Former CIA remote viewers (www.courtneybrown.com / www.davidmorehouse.com & many more...), to former government/military whistleblowers (www.disclosureproject.org), to experiencers (www.centerchange.org/passport) to contactees (www.eceti.org) We need to evolve a potential political understanding of law that applies to the Universe to better understand where we fit within its possible Hierarchy of higher intelligence that will lead to communicate with those who are apparently engaging our world. - Pierre, Sept. 20, 2004

Keep
Exopolitics is fast catching on and we need it under this heading for all researchers who consult this encyclopaedia for information on the subject. This is a legitimate topic; scientificaly correct or science theory. As an encyclopaedia of general knowledge scientific proof is not an issue. To debate deletion on the basis of scientific principles is not a valid mandate in Wikipedia to my knowledge. Mick