Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Failbetter

Hello, my name is Thom Didato, I am one of the editors of failbetter. We entered the article in good faith (told it was better to have article created from the actual source), all info and links provided/cited are real and can be confirmed -- and are not promotional. We used other magazine entries as our guide (Paris Review, etc.) but if there is something objectionable please let us know and/or edit entry accordingly.

Please famalirize (I can't spell :P) with WP:NOT and this sort of falls under WP:AUTO.Yanksox 20:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Per rules, we have edited/revised page to remove any promotional element. Again, all other links and facts stated can be confirmed. If there is specific passage that you feel violate rules, please point out and we'll revise. Many thanks.

Please read the second WP. Yanksox 20:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Ahh...we'll let a non-involved party start the article then. Our mistake.