Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ferenc Miskolczi

Tillamn tried to make some connection with notability by asserting Also a rather extensive article rebutting his "Alternative Greenhouse Theory" at Real Climate.

I didn't believe that. There's no article on the RC blog that I can see. I suggested that T had mistaken the much-less-notable RC wiki for the RC blog.

Tillman then evaded replying. Perhaps we could sort it out here? Presumably T knows what he meant, and could say so, instead of being evasive William M. Connolley (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The article I referred to was "Rebuttal of Miskolczi's Alternative Greenhouse Theory", ref #10 at our article.


 * "I think its more likely he was desperately scrabbling for something that made FM look notable" --WMC, 17:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC). Yeah, that's the way to attract a non-snarky reply, eh? --Pete Tillman (talk) 00:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * WTF? That's not an article at RC at all. Its a PDF from elsewhere William M. Connolley (talk) 08:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hosted at RC, but you're right, by two scientists, working paper??. No idea of this paper's history or why RC hosted same. --Pete Tillman (talk) 20:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)