Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/FlexJobs

Flexjobs article deletion
How is it that 2 or 3 people (from nations that don't even use the product or service) decide that an article ought to be deleted? I understand that Wikipedia is an oligopoly, but to have 3 military aficionados based in Europe decide the fate of an American-based job search website (where work and employment conditions are entirely different) seems contrary to the mission of Wikipedia. It seems to me that those who make make these decisions ought to have some level of exposure and knowledge about the topic. While reading the comments here, in favor of deletion it becomes apparent that those with their thumbs down had no such expertise or life experience (simply because of their location). Is this why Wikipedia is so imbalanced in its article representation? Is it why virtually no women are editors on Wikipedia (except those as aggressive as the men)? This is the 3rd article that I have recently come across on Wikipedia, that probably should not have been deleted. (I cannot vouch for the quality of the article because I never saw it.) One was written by a woman, the other by a probable male that made known his tremendous discomfort at having his work removed by a human veto (Undo). Was this also the initiative of a woman? While logical reasoning is a viable method of achieving reconciliation in thought, having read the comments it does not seem that negotiation was the basis of the decision here. It is obvious in this discussion that the aggressors simply outweighed those of moderating opinion. Hopefully, Wikipedia will soon modify and adopt a more conciliatory approach that will permit a greater balance to the human voice than is witnessed here, or in its many threads... Food for thought... Regards... Stevenmitchell (talk) 08:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC)