Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Fluther.com

There is no reason this site does not deserve a wikipedia article. Look at the list of similar websites that already have articles on Wikipedia, why should Fluther be excluded? Open up your favorite search engine and pop in the word "Fluther" and you will see how well known and "notable" this site is. Just because Fluther is not as notable as other website (i.e. Google) does not negate it's importance and value. I urge you to reconsider the deletion of this article and to see that this is a noteworthy website that belongs in this encyclopedia. We will never give up. Joefedewa (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:THISNUMBERISHUGE. A site has to pass the notability criteria to have an article.  TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 22:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

I hope you all realize what complete and utter bullshit this is. Hypocritical, unfair, condescending Wiki warlords being overly strict on what? A site with legit notabales and big time backers. I have no affiliation with the site besides being one of the thousands of members. This article is going to keep being created over and over and over again because it deserves a place in Wikipedia. I look around at all the stupid worthless articles and I wonder how much better Wikipedia would be if you put as much thought into those as you have into Fluther. Thank you for ruining my view of Wikipedia. Joefedewa (talk) 21:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Dude, if you think Fluther meets the notability criteria then edit the page to show that it meets the notability criteria. And if you think all those other pages don't meet the notability criteria, flag them for deletion. 173.51.29.215 (talk) 22:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)