Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Foo Conner

Should this be relisted a 3rd time?
Keeping in mind that WP:RELIST frowns at the idea of relisting a third time, this AFD has not received much attention.

FIFAukr was blocked as a VOA with a suspicious pattern of editing AFDs so soon after account creation and possibly being a sock. With their !votes being assumed to be in some sort of bad faith, I feel that this should be relisted a third time. (AFDs that are relisted 3 of more times have their own list, so they tend to get more attention that any debates wasting away after 1 or 2 relists)

I didn't want to take this to DELREVIEW quite yet because I haven't formed an opinion on the subject and don't want to do something for process' sake, but for the reasons I mentioned above this AFD has neither consensus for keeping or deletion. Pinging (with apologies), , and. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  01:55, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It appears I may have somehow double pinged yall. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  01:56, 13 April 2019 (UTC)