Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/From where to what language evolution theory

Just wanted to apologize ahead if I accidentally violated any of your guidelines. However, I do want to state that this model is based on a peer reviewed paper, so I disagree with categorizing it as a fringe theory. I believe this topic is important and wish your will agree with me and not delete the page. PolivaOren (talk) 04:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)


 * It's okay to have this stated on the main page. But since you posted it here as well, I'll jump on the chance to tell you that not knowing the Wikipedia policies exactly is not a big issue, and if you're new here, it's understandable, but ignoring warnings when you are actually pointed to relevant policies, and keeping on editing (or even reverting) anyway is quite problematic. You repeatedly reverted Origin of language to push your theory in, even after the edit summaries as well as the article's talk page as well as your own talk page were filling up with warnings. You were informed your conflict of interest was a problem. But what did you do instead of stopping and reading the relevant policies, and acting accordingly (and I had told you quite succinctly, without needing to read a ton of things, that the short version was: don't edit articles you have a COI on, instead, discuss additions on the talk page and let others make them)? You created a whole new article solely about your theory, even taking - I assume - illustrations and such from the paper itself.
 * Moral of the story? Make mistakes, no problem, but when they're pointed out, stop and check what's going on. LjL (talk) 17:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)