Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/FundRazr

The content provided on this page followed guidelines and exactly the model of countless other companies sharing factual information for the Wikipedia audience. For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoFundMe and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiegogo. While I work for FundRazr, all points were referenced with objective external sources. Any brand on Wikipedia was likely started by that brand, let's be realistic. The only internal sources were public pages showing the notable projects mentioned with proof of the amount raised.

The tone of the editor VQuakr does not appear to show any neutrality as opioninated language is used "prolific marketing department" etc. How is removing source references to media sources like "Read, Write, Web" or "TechVibes" the neutral activity of an objective editor. Look at the 2 examples above which follow exactly the same approach, as do thousands of other posts. This raises the question of neutrality and why FundRazr is being singled out - what connections does VQuakr have...Bretzky63 (talk) 21:03, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm copying this to the AfD page. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)