Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gamemaster's screen

Gamemaster's screen
Hi Wumbolo. Do you really consider that "Gamemaster's screen" should be deleted? why? Kintaro (talk) 19:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)


 * My reason is at Articles for deletion/Gamemaster's screen. WP:NPRODUCT says that we need third-party coverage to have an article about a product. w umbolo   ^^^  19:56, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but you completely missed the point. Let us put it that way: "Nike Air Max 90" is to "shoe" what "Dungeon Masters Screen" is to "Gamemaster's screen". You got it, right? a gamemaster's screen is only a type of accessory used in roleplaying-games, same as dice or character sheets. The article "Gamemaster's screen" is not affected by WP:NPRODUCT, same as nor it is the article "shoe". Please, proceed as it is due and remove the delete notice. Kintaro (talk) 20:20, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The delete notice will be removed in six days if there's a consensus to keep it. It's fine as it is. Chetsford (talk) 00:44, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * No, it's not fine as it is. Chetsford, what part of is not affected by  don't you understand? The article "Shoe" does not refer to a product, nor does the article "Gamemaster's screen". You can add a "Citation needed" template to this article if you want, but WP:NPRODUCT doesn't apply here. User Wumbolo made a mistake, it is as simple as that. Kintaro (talk) 08:26, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * "No, it's not fine as it is." Yes, it is. This isn't a race. Chetsford (talk) 09:50, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * By the way, let's clarify that the term "dungeon" appearing in the lead section only adds to the already existing confusion. The lead section states: "also called dungeon master's (DM) screen" but such a statement is absolutely reductive, as if only the Dungeons & Dragons game uses gamemaster's screens, which is ridiculous. User Qwertyus added that part in 2013, perhaps because he is a Dungeons & Dragons fan, who knows, but that part of the leading section is reductive and false anyway. It should be removed. Kintaro (talk) 08:45, 27 November 2018 (UTC)