Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/George Santos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. This is without a doubt a notable person and that is not a valid deletion rationale. Saving us all the time. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

George Santos

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The subject has been the target of criminal investigations and scandals. This could jeopardise his worthiness of having an article on wikipedia. 108.53.232.130 (talk) 17:35, 16 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep  Even with criminal investigations, individual is an elected member of the US Congress and has received widespread coverage in media sources establishing both WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV.
 * Epluribusunumyall (talk) 17:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. That's, like, not a reason for deletion under WP:DP or WP:BIODEL.  He's a very public figure, and he's a Member of Congress and will always have been one. Samp4ngeles (talk) 18:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.