Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gephi


 * Ok, I've added some academic references.
 * Please could you give me some insights on our conflict of interest, especially on why we have one, and Cytoscape not?
 * The software passed the alpha level several times, as this project became in 2006, but we don't follow the Debian or GNU policy about version numbers. Also you'll find several softwares assuming a "version 1.0" with lot more bugs than any alpha version well prepared. Should I add to the reference list the organizations already using the tool, like the MIT giving 5 stars to the software one year ago?
 * I have responded at Talk:Gephi to most of your points. The last reference is probably the best one you have provided so far but it appears to have been sourced from webatlas which from one of the previously given references is related to the project and so possibly not independent. You should make your arguments for keeping the article on Articles for deletion/Gephi instead of the talk page - more people are likely to see it there noq (talk) 00:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC)