Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ghosts In the Black

Nicely done. I offered to merge this page instead of deletion, and the consensus was to merge it, but you deleted it anyway. All of my work is gone. This whole process was insane from the get-go... nominated for deletion within 5 minutes of the page being created and no effort whatsoever to preserve the original, fully-documented research that I spent hours providing. I'm never contributing work to Wikipedia again. Godfred99 (talk) 20:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)Godfred99
 * It looks like did the redirect, so pinging him for more information.  -- RoySmith (talk) 20:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * BTW, the original article history is still there, so all the old content is still available. There's nothing to prevent anybody from performing a merge at this point.  -- RoySmith (talk) 20:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello, I redirected instead of merging because at Firefly Role-Playing Game, the other supplements are listed with name and date only. I thought it would look weird and make the coverage uneven if I made another subsection with all of the details on Ghosts in the Black.  Any ideas on a better way to do this?  --Cerebellum (talk) 20:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I can re-work the Firefly page to house this material there, if somebody can link me to where the info on this page is housed. Thanks for your help.
 * Ok sure, it is located here. You can also see it by going here and viewing the history.  Hope that helps.  --Cerebellum (talk) 23:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)