Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Global Trust Council (2nd nomination)

The close
WP:NOTTEMPORARY (NTEMP) states, "Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of 'significant coverage' in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." Ammarpad specifically stated that since it did not have ongoing coverage, the notability had been temporary, but that is the opposite of what NTEMP says. Consensus of the first AfD hasn't changed and was not open to being overturned, as the nominator brought this decision to AfD, not DRV. Of course consensus has changed, which is normal in a case of NTEMP. I don't know what to suggest about the close, as it wants to be an IAR close claiming the authority of DRV. The least the close could do is respect clear policy-based arguments. Unscintillating (talk) 00:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)