Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Heart In Diamond

I disagree that Forbes it not a reliable source. There are roughly 60,000 wikipedia articles that cite Forbes.com contributor articles. Please check here: https://www.google.com.ar/search?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikipedia.org%2F+forbes&oq=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikipedia.org%2F+forbes&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.14913j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=https://en.wikipedia.org/+%22Forbes.+Retrieved%22&*

I disagree that Huffpost is an unreliable source, there are roughly 120,000 wikipedia articles that cite Huffpost. Please check here: https://www.google.com.ar/search?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikipedia.org%2F+forbes&oq=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikipedia.org%2F+forbes&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.14913j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=https://en.wikipedia.org/+%22huffingtonpost.com.+Retrieved%22&*

Alternative sources: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2736140/I-turned-dead-husband-diamond-The-bizarre-trend-making-keepsakes-loved-one-s-ashes.html (peer reviewed)

About your last argument and your insinuation that the author is a consultant with PR connections: can you please let me know where exactly it is stated that people that are consultants cannot contribute to Wikipedia, even if they are not in any way connected to the page they are trying to edit?


 * Hi I think you misunderstood my comment I was talking about the Forbes authors being PR consultants...but now that you admit to being a PR consultant yourself you might want to read WP:COI. Domdeparis (talk) 13:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)