Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Hunting (House)

Scope
The nominator wishes to extend the scope of the discussion and added numerous other articles with this edit. This seems improper because the discussion had already been underway for two days. And we also have enough confusion and drama owing to the activity of a disruptive sockpuppet.

I reverted the extension but now the nominator is edit-warring to re-extend it. I shall revert again and suggest that the matter be discussed here. Colonel Warden (talk) 11:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The edit-warring is all you, Sir. That you are confused is not my fault, and if something seems improper to you, it is time to fine-tune your vision. Plenty of other participants in the discussion have asked for these nominations to be bundled. Your edit summary says "revert per talk"--how deceitful. Drmies (talk) 11:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This is the talk page referred to. Colonel Warden (talk) 11:48, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, where you dropped your dictum. The facetiousness is the implication that there would be some sort of discussion, some sort of consensus-there isn't. Drmies (talk) 12:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Colonel, please see Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. Drmies (talk) 11:41, 25 September 2010 (UTC)