Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/IRCDig

KernelPanic removed my note in regards to his keep, and since the discussion is now archived, I'll leave the intact part here. It may seem like a redundant note, but I think it's important to make things clearer for the admin making the decision.


 * Keep Why do all you care so much about deleting this article. I agree with packVillian, the article is informative and not advertising.  There are numerous other similar articles for most torrent search engines.  Looking through most of your guys contribs, it seems all most of you do is recommend articles for deletion.  Give the guy a break.  It seems well written and nuetral. And yes I registered an account specifically to comment on this but I have been a participant on wikipedia for years. KernelPanic 13:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: User's first edit. Haakon 15:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Haakon 21:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Haakon re-created this page just to add a comment that had nothing to do with the discussion or the outcome just because I nominated one of his articles for deletion. He is a retaliation artists and should be put in check. KernelPanic 23:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

I didn't recreate any page; and I didn't add anything that you didn't already maliciously remove. Haakon 07:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Page history does not lie KernelPanic 11:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)