Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Idenics

F451s comments after some of the votes
Why do you feel the need to comment after each person you think has a "pro CoS" viewpoint? Do any of us go around commenting about your "pro Freezone" viewpoint?HubcapD 04:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It is called WP:HARASS and WP:DE. --Justanother 15:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I have a large collection of diffs of F451's "greatest hits", in which he stalks, insults, and baits at least twenty different editors. If anyone gets sick of his tirades eventually and wishes to lodge a major complaint against his behavior, I'd be only too happy to contribute my two cents. (Of course, he'd just say we're all obviously part of the OSA "hatchet job" conspiracy.) wikipediatrix 16:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You could introduce it at the current related COFS arb if you want. Seeing as F451 has made himself a party to it and was actually the first to introduce "evidence". --Justanother 16:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


 * No Justanother, I am not a party to that arbitration, only one who provided some evidence. I think there is a clear pattern of tendentious editing by many cofs connected editors that shows their editing scientology related articles is a conflict of interest.--Fahrenheit451 17:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Doesn't matter, I'd bet there is room for you, especially based on your behavior here. But that is 'trix' call. --Justanother 02:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Justanother, wikipediatrix has indicated that refering to her as trix or trixi is offensive. Why do you continue to use that nick?--Fahrenheit451 15:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I've seen her complain about "Trixi", but not "Trix".HubcapD 16:52, 28 August 2007 (UTC)