Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Indeed.com

This article was nominated for deletion by a competitor, CVDB.pk. I just closed it as a "speedy keep" since this was a bad faith nomination. Two of this competitor's IPs had been blocked, its spam article deleted (twice) and its domain blacklisted and this appears to have been a retaliatory act of spite against both Indeed.com and Wikipedia. See:
 * MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist (permanent link)

I reviewed Indeed.com's notability when I closed the debate. This included running a Google News archive search (187 hits) and a look at the company's media coverage page. I believe this company is likely notable however my closure of this AfD as a "speedy keep" was based on procedural grounds.

This article still reads like a company press release, however. -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:52, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Looks good. Speedy keep and a rewrite. Darkspots (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)