Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Intelligent designer

Move to Speedy Keep
I move to speedy keep this article and close this AFD. There's strong consensus to keep and the bringer of this AFD seems less than well-informed on the topic. FeloniousMonk 23:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * It's not a valid AfD is the nominator is asking for a merge, so I'd say yes, it should be a speedy (but a note to that effect should go on the main page, since this doesn't make it into the transinclude). Guettarda 23:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * It is a valid AfD and always was. The nominator didn't ask for a merge, the nominator, acting in good faith, suggested that the article might have some valid points that could be salvaged but insisted on a redirect that will destroy the article.  In the future there will only be nominating business and no polite ameliorating suggestions.  Endomion 02:15, 22 December 2005 (UTC)