Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Islamic nationalism

This page has obviously been rushed and is overly reliant on either 1) Sources from a different language 2) completely incorrect attributions such as the the heading titled "Chechnya" (regular nationalism that plays into the idea of a collective "Islamic identity" is different from "Islamic nationalism.") 3) The article is blatantly biased at certain points i.e. when discussing Haji Amin Al Hosseini a Nazi collaborator (which a) doesn't necessarily mean he is an Islamic Nationalist and B) is a trope peddled by Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu). Wikipedia shouldn't be a place for propaganda. The final point is that the entire article lacks primary sources from Islamic Scripture/Hadiths/Scholarly Opinions/Consensus'. This is seen by a variety of unsourced material, sources that are in different languages whose verifiability is lacking, and finally an Introduction that fails to explain the concept concisely which leads to a page that has many different beliefs and ideas and fails to lead to an explanation of the topic the page was created for. To the person that said there are pages that direct to Hindu and Christian Nationalism, those pages have primary sources that lead to an explanation of a coherent ideology whose tenets are rooted (or misinterpreted) from core religious texts/sermons/beliefs.