Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Itamar attack


 * Post-closure edit - For the record, my nomination of this article for deletion is not "politically motivated". As a member of a family that only recently (within the last thirty years) came to the U.S. from Israel, I am most certainly sensitive and concerned with the issues facing the region. I consider it rather offensive that the IP contributor (who chose not to sign their comment) would accuse me of "insulting the memory of the departed by erasing this horrific event due to political motivations". Strikerforce (talk) 04:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * This was closed prematurely. It also looks like User:Basket of Puppies "voted" twice. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 10:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Even if so is the case it is still enough users in favour of Keep to let it stay that way. Even if not counting in one of basket of puppies two votes.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Its not a vote, so "enough users in favour" doesn't mean anything, not enough time was given to let a dialogue develop.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Still no reason for bringing the Afd up for now anyway. Wait a week or so before we can evaluate the situation of this particular incident.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Im only suggesting it because im quite certain it will be brought up as a reason for Keep, that it is to early for evaluation of the events notability and will most likely end up with a Speedy keep.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I did not !vote twice. I voted once and once put forth a motion to SNOW CLOSE the AfD. That motion can be supported or opposed, but in itself does not at all constitute a !vote. You do understand the difference between them, right? In the future when you allege something against a fellow edit you ought to notify them. Alright? Basket of Puppies  22:57, 13 March 2011 (UTC)